Implementing Smart Power

david lettis's picture

President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton have signaled a willingness to shift American foreign policy to what has been deemed a “Smart Power” approach by promising more resources to international development and civilian capabilities.  However, with the global economy in shambles and resources becoming increasingly difficult to come by, there is a large gap between the idea of Smart Power and the capacity to implement Smart Power.  Today, in light of the new policy direction, the Center for U.S. Global Engagement hosted a conference, “Putting ‘Smart Power’ to Work,” bringing together senior policymakers including Deputy Secretary of State Jacob Lew and Former Secretary of State General Colin Powell to discuss the necessary changes needed to implement foreign policy based on a Smart Power plan.

According to the panelists, implementing a Smart Power approach requires a major investment – both in political will and financial. Additional resources are required to expand international development and strengthen civilian capabilities within USAID and the Department of State.  General Powell describes the challenge of meeting these targets on par with trench warfare with Congress.  However, the Obama administration not only needs to win over Congress, but possibly most importantly, the American people. Building citizen awareness of the issue could in turn push Congress to direct more funds toward bolstering the necessary institutions.

Citizen awareness, according to the panelists, which also included former Congressman Jim Leach, Senator Robert Menendez, and Wendy Sherman (a former Clinton official now with the Albright Group), is necessary to show the country that the economic crisis should not prevent us from engaging internationally.  Rather, expanding international development will foster international goodwill and will likely strengthen global markets, ultimately benefiting the U.S. economy and increase demand for American goods.  If a Smart Power approach is executed correctly, then in the future defense spending may not be required at current levels, striking a much desired balance between defense and diplomacy.

Interestingly, General Powell said that while he thinks Smart Power is a vast improvement over the “soft” and “hard” powers approaches of the past, he still isn’t comfortable with how the term “power” is perceived abroad.  Rather, General Powell suggests rephrasing out approach in terms of  “Smart Influence,” emphasizing American ideals over force.  Powell believes it is imperative to maintain a strong military and go in strong when necessary, but it is compassion which will increase America’s standing in the world, and decrease the likelihood of a military confrontation.

In the end, though, it comes down to money.  To establish the foreign policy our leaders have deemed necessary, we need the resources.

Do you agree? Check out the ongoing Next America Debate and weigh in: "Should the US scale back foreign assistance?"

Overseas Travel

david lettis's picture

Definitely agree with both comments below.  Especially with Danielle in terms of the need for people to travel and experience foreign cultures.  At the forum sponsored by the Center for U.S. Global Engagement, Wendy Sherman even takes this idea one step further and says that we as citizens need to push our congressional leaders to travel abroad.  As it is today, according to Sherman, there is almost an unspoken rule that members of congress should remain in the country and not go abroad.  Perhaps if they traveled more frequently, though, they might be more inclined to increase funding and resources to the Smart Power movement.

Power

Ulysses1's picture

I don't know much about international relations, but I do know that international projects will never be popular during a recession. Americans want to help themselves and other Americans first, like it or not.

I do know about marketing and writing, and Powell is correct to be wary of the word "power." I can't imagine that it's popular overseas. Are we talking more about Responsible Leadership? It's not just carrots and sticks, right? Smart Influence is good, but there might be something better.

There is no doubt that great

dbarbeau's picture

There is no doubt that great investment in all major spheres will be necessary, should Americans truly hope to shift to 'Smart Power'. It is logical that the country is currently focusing its efforts domestically rather than internationally, but opening up markets will not only aid the country economically in the long run, but will most likely have positive externalities for Obama politically (Republicans tend towards the support of market expansion, and less conflict leads to more political allies). Without domestic resources, however, even aid to foreign countries can end up with sore consequences for both parties.

In order to use our resources efficiently and effectively, domestic workers need to understand how to implement such strategies abroad. Furthermore, there are a large portion of Americans who have no international experience and are therefore especially unlikely to support foreign aid investment. Not to mention, Obama has quite a bit on his plate at the moment, and more than one critic for each proposed policy and strategy. It is due to these reasons that it would be wise to invest in Smart Power domestically (to build capacity in USAID, for example through the enhancement of civilian capabilities and investment in social capital) before bringing it to a global scale - or at least simultaneously.

Danielle C. Barbeau, MPA
Gestión Internacional y
Desarrollo Económico Sostenible

CATHALAC
111 Ciudad del Saber, Clayton
0843-03102 Panamá

Tel. (507) 604-04149
danielle.barbeau@cathalac.org

Join the Discussion

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options